intasc and cec standardsintasc and cec standards

I,II,III,IV) CEC Standards 2,3,5,6,8,9,10 D. Compare and contrast findings from current research on perception, attention, cognition, consciousness, brain Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) is a resource for ongoing teacher development established by the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). Providing only means or other whole group statistical data for overall performance is not acceptable. The teacher works with others to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, and that encourage positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation. CEC InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards 11 Standard #2: Learning Differences The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that enable each learner to meet high standards. (LogOut/ For example, one candidate cannot choose to submit a lesson plan to demonstrate planning while other candidates choose to submit a unit plan.. Suite 800Washington, DC 20001202.336.7000, InTASC Research Studies Templates by Standard, Design, Assessment, and Implementation Principles for Educator Micro-credentials, Louisiana State Education Chief Testifies at House Hearing, Ensuring an Equitable Opportunity: Providing a High-Quality Education for Students with Disabilities. PDF Making the Most of INTASC Standards - ed For each of the CEC Preparation Standards and elements as informed by the appropriate knowledge and skill set(s) all of the evidence is considered and a determination is made as to whether it reflects that candidates are meeting the standard and elements as informed by the appropriate knowledge and skill set(s). Summary of ITASC and CEC Standards 1 .docx - Running Head: INTASC/CEC 2008), Core Principle #1 Both general and special education teachers have command of the subject matter. The data should also be disaggregated by rubric indicator. What are the explicit expectations for rubrics and the rubric indicators? Standard #9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice - The teacher engages in ongoing professional learning and uses evidence to continually Is alignment of rubric indicators to specific CEC Knowledge and Skill Specialty sets items required? Data generated must be usable for purposes of assessing candidate performance, program improvement, and evidence the CEC Standards and elements as informed by the appropriate knowledge and skill set(s) are met. If a program results in an advanced degree in special education but it does not result in licensure or an additional credential to perform in an advanced role in special education what Standards and elements should be used to design the program? Two of the knowledge and skill set(s) are across categories and severity ranges: Individualized Independence Curriculum (IIC) and Individualized General Curriculum (IGC) knowledge and skill sets. Field experiences are expected to provide rich, scaffolded, developmental, and graduated experiences with increasing responsibilities for prospective special educators. Also, field experiences must be across the preparation program and connected and sufficiently extensive and intensive for candidates to develop and demonstrate proficiencies in the professional roles for which they are preparing.. may download the InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards and Learning Progressions for Teachers 1.0directly from the CCSSO. The disaggregated data must be reported for each administration cycle of each assessment. The overall data must be accompanied by indicator and indicator performance level data. PDF InTASC - CCSSO Which knowledge and skill set (s) should be used to inform the CEC Standards and elements if the program prepares candidates for an initial multicategorical special education credential/license or prepares candidates across the severity range? CEC (2011) Standards mean Council for Exceptional children (CEC). What are some examples of content assessments? 84 0 obj <>stream Educators are expected to use technology to improve student learning Special Education Philosophy: Beliefs and Values. Change), You are commenting using your Facebook account. To submit a report, CAEP should be notified of the intention to submit program reports. decision making. INTASC Standards A Community of Teachers (CoT) prepares teachers to empower individuals through creating personal and pedagogy, as well as knowledge of learners and the community context. If the special education program is designed to lead to two or more initial special education credentials and ALL candidate program completers earn the same credentials then only one program report is required. There is also aflowchart that will guide you to the appropriate specialty set(s)that should inform program development, assessment development and rubric design. What constitutes a program for purposes of submission through the CEC/CAEP specialty program review process? Global alignment to CAEP and InTASC and/or State standards is not sufficient. For more detailed information about the InTASC Model Core teaching Standards: A resource for State Dialogue (April 2011), refer to this link: The following is the 10 INTASC standards paralleled with the dimensions of teaching that are provided in CEHS at UNL. Preponderance of evidence is a standard of proof. A thorough description of the content and context for the grades being used. The exception is if the first submission provided no data for an assessment then the resubmission must include two sets of data for that given assessment. For example, programs may use a lesson plan that is included in the portfolio as the planning assessment (#3 in Option A (1) and the generated data, OR the entire portfolio, but may not use both the portfolio and the lesson plan individually to constitute one of the programmatic assessments included in the program submission. learners to develop deep understanding of content areas and their connections, and Intasc and Cec Standards. The sequence of performance levels must be developmental from level to level with increasing expectations for each performance level. If a portfolio is used ALL candidates must submit the same set of artifacts. 2 InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards Acknowledgements InTASC would like to express its sincere appreciation to the National Education Association, the Educational Testing Service, and Evaluation Systems group of Pearson for providing the funding for this project. Further information is available at theCEC Professional Standards Technical Assistance webpage. these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners to assure mastery Rubrics & Scoring Guides:Program faculty should assure that the rubrics and indicators reflect the knowledge and skills essential for safe and effective practice in that given specialty area. Crosswalk: High Leverage Practices to CEC Standards Components Do references to CEC Standards pertain to the Initial or Advanced CEC Preparation Standards, or to the CEC Knowledge & Skill Specialty Sets? Examples of content assessments, other than proprietary tests include: teacher work samples, IEPs, IFSPs, FBAs, and clinical practice assessments. To reach this goal, INTASC created 10 standards. CEC Advanced Standards are to be used by preparation programs preparing special education candidates for advanced roles and professional practice. The CAEP and CEC websites both provide multiple resources. Is it acceptable for indicators of rubrics to be aligned to more than one standard and/or element? Candidate performance data must demonstrate that candidates are meeting the performance expectations as delineated in the Standards and elements as informed by the appropriate knowledge and skill set(s). The The evidence must be clear and convincing. If the program does not result in additional licensures or ability to practice in additional role(s) a CEC specialty association program report is not required. I want this job but the manager hasn't offered it to me yet. The program review is specific to the program being aligned to and providing evidence the CEC Standards and elements are met. The test and the data must be administered, used and reported consistent with copyright and other proprietary standardized test parameters and ethical use. Assessments and rubrics should be aligned to the Advanced Standards and elements as informed by an appropriate knowledge and skill set; for example, special education administrator, technology specialist, transition specialist, and others (consult What Every Special Educator Must Know for a list of Advanced Specialty Sets.). The program report must provide clear and convincing evidence that candidates progress through a series of developmentally appropriate and sequenced field experiences with individuals with disabilities across the full range of ages, disability categories and severity, with collaborative opportunities appropriate to the licensure/certification and roles for which candidates are being prepared. Academics. Field experiences must be supervised by qualified professionals, and program faculty should be involved in supervision and evaluation of field experiences. If in the first submission no data was submitted then two sets of data are required in the resubmission. These are just examples the selection of what to use as a content assessment if the State or program does not require a standardized test this is left to the discretion of the program. The CAEP Standards are Standards that must be met across Educator Preparation Programs (EPP) in a given institution. No, CEC National Recognition is only available to programs pursuing CAEP Accreditation. PDF Model Core Teaching Standards - ed The elements are labelled 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3-7.3 across the seven CEC Preparation Standards. The CAEP standards are not program specific. If a program is multicategorical across the severity range both would be used. PDF Summary of Updated InTASC Core Teaching Standards InTASC Standards - Department of Education - Montana State University For instance, two themes emerging from the two regulations include identifying individual learner developments and considering appropriate learning environments. The edTPA and the data may be used as supplementary evidence for meeting CEC Preparation Standards, butthe edTPA may not be used as the sole source of evidence for meeting any CEC Preparation Standard. Each level/tier must provide a description of expected candidate performance at this given level/tier for each discrete indicator. The standard requires preparation program faculty with their school partners to have designed, implemented, and evaluated sequential and developmental experiences and clinical practica sufficient for prospective special educators to develop and apply knowledge, skills, and dispositions essential to the roles for which they are being prepared. The Conditions must be addressed in the resubmitted report. The Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) and CEC, standards are two different professional teaching standards to inform of the professional, responsibilities and design appropriate curriculum. Please enable Javascript functionality in your browser so you do not see this message again. Standard #7: Planning for Instruction - The teacher plans instruction that supports every student in meeting rigorous learning Rubric indicators must focus on consequential attributes and must address increasing levels of functioning. The content of the Specialty Knowledge and Skill set(s) is what differentiates program assessments. Is it CECs expectation that BOTH a cooperating teacher/certified special education specialist AND a university supervisor are involved in supervision and evaluation of candidates in field experiences and clinical practice? Conceptual Framework, as well as the standards of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation,are While proprietary tests, if required by the State or program, must be used as Assessment #1 in an Option A (1) program report and the CEC mandated 80% pass rate must be met no proprietary test or the edTPA should be used as the sole or primary evidence a given CEC Preparation Standard or its elements as informed by the appropriate specialty knowledge and skill set(s) is met. CEC Program Report FAQ | Council for Exceptional Children The teacher engages in ongoing professional learning and uses evidence to continually evaluate his/her practice, particularly the effects of his/her choices and actions on others (learners, families, other professionals, and the community), and adapts to practice to meet the need of each learner. The CEC guides structured observation and assessment of candidate proficiency in InTASC category Learner and Learning, including items derived from the all six standards on the rubric. According to the United States Department of Labor Occupational, special education teachers must work with students with learning, emotional, mental, or physical disabilities (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2022). InTASC standards and CEC Initial Preparation Standards 1.docx An additional section is required in the submission to remove conditions; in this section a description needs to be provided of actions taken to address Conditions since the prior submission. Heinle & Heinle Publication. Teachers handbook: Contextualized language instruction. When is it appropriate to link reports? According to the expectations of the profession expressed in the InTASC standards, describe how teachers are expected to assume the responsibilities of improving practice and advancing the profession. Best Answer Top Expert 500+ questions answered There are 10 standards. Rubrics may be 3-tier rank (i.e. If a State requires a proprietary test and/or the program requires all candidates must take a given proprietary test to complete a program this test must be used to constitute Assessment #1, content assessment, of the 6-8 assessments required in an Option A (1) format program report. The 10 Professional Standards All Effective Teachers Must Meet 0 The edTPA is a proprietary test, and must be used as designed, without modification. professionals, and community members to ensure learner growth, and to advance the Demonstrates a repertoire of pedagogical skills that develop all students' critical and independent thinking, and performance capabilities. Programs are encouraged to carefully consider all reviewer comments in the prior review and to contact the CEC Program Review Coordinator for guidance as to how to proceed in making programmatic and assessments changes needed to meet Standards and elements. More information on linking shells is provided on theCAEP website. (INTASC Core Principles #4-10). The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas, and designs and implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences. Recently, you have noticed that she is always tired and showing signs of carelessness. As part of the process of updating the InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards, InTASC commissioned a review of research from 1990 to 2011 on the main topics addressed by the standards. Given the program review is a review of the program evidence and specific to the candidates in that given program the assessments and evidence must align in apparent ways to the CEC Preparation Standards and elements as informed by the appropriate specialty set(s). This help recognize define the critical role in special education. Special educators, like all education professionals, have a unique public trust. All assessments and rubrics should be focused on performance, not surface features or parts of the product being assessed. The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to monitor learner progress, and to guide the teachers and learners decision making. May a program submit rubrics and data from Educator Preparation Program (EPP) created assessments and rubrics? According to the Council for Exceptional Childrens webpage, CEC professional preparation, standards define the specialized expertise educators must master for the safe and effective. (InTASC 3,7,8/CEC 2, 5) Rubric indicators must focus on consequential attributes and must address increasing levels of functioning. According to InTASC standards, teachers are expected . If you still have questions after consulting the flowchart, please contactprostandards@exceptionalchildren.org. If a program culminates with candidates having earned licensure/certificates in more than one area of special education (for example, mild/moderate and severe/profound or mild and intensive) are discrete program reports required for submission? The teacher understands how to connect concepts and use differing perspectives to engage learners in critical thinking, creativity, and collaborative problem solving related to authentic local and global issues. A program cannot be Recognized without data. These two standards are different but have some. 2023 Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). h{k7_6$gF[mFn-;DL&+[z+!O2`. endstream endobj startxref (INTASC, 2008). Education has remained a significant right for all individuals in the United States. Number of levels (tiers) is a programmatic decision. content knowledge and foster collaborative skills of new and veteran teachers. Items from CEC Standard 2, applied also at mid-point, reflect growth at program completion compared to midpoint with average scores at Target. InTASC Standards (formerly called InTASC Principles) are a support tool to promote and improve teacher effectiveness and growth. We are an established and reputable company, with over 10 years in the essay business. Zoe is one of the best students in your 3rd-gradeclass. In 2011, the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) a nonpartisan, nationwide, They include the - Studocu University of Georgia University of the People Maryville University Western Governors University Keiser University Harvard University University of California Los Angeles University of Houston-Clear Lake Miami Dade College (LogOut/ There are seven CEC Preparation Standards with twenty-eight key elements. The assessment and the rubric should be designed to require observers/raters to make judgements on consequential attributes of candidates performance. A data set is constituted by data aggregated by semester or by year not by singular or discrete submissions. InTASC gives detailed implementation of standards, while CEC is instructional standards. It is incumbent on the program to demonstrate this alignment in apparent ways in the program report submitted. The decision for each standard is a reasoned judgment by a set of collegial reviewers and auditors based onallof the evidence presented. Explain how these themes are represented in each standard set and how they relate to the knowledge, skills, and values of effective teachers.Describe how each set of standards addresses professional collaboration and student-driven, data-informed instructional decision-making.According to the expectations of the profession expressed in the InTASC standards, describe how teachers are expected to assume the responsibilities of improving practice and advancing the profession.Cite the CEC and InTASC standards in your analysis.While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, (Generally 2 tiers do not provide meaningful and usable data.) How does an institution/program initiate submission of program review report(s) to seek program recognition by CEC? As a general rule it is not good practice to attempt to align an assessment to all the standards and elements or indicate on the Section III chart that an assessment provides evidence for each and every Standard. Discrete edTPA rubrics cannot be used or modified to constitute a programmatic assessment. How do we access the CEC Preparation Standards and elements and the knowledge and skill sets? The CEC Standards and elements are rich with significant breadth and depth and are interrelated.