student code of academic integrity university of phoenixstudent code of academic integrity university of phoenix

Any primary hearing with the instructor not present must be recorded. Classroom Misconduct and Other Behavior Disruptive to the Educational Process. Last Updated November 18, 2020. Students are responsible for ensuring each assignment submitted is new, regardless if information has been taken from their own previous assignments. University of the People students are expected to work diligently to ensure that all assignments, exams or other coursework submitted represents the students original work and follows acceptable academic practices. Witnesses from within the University community are expected to cooperate in any proceedings under this Code. endstream endobj 577 0 obj <>stream The practical aim of the Integrity Code is to create education experiences from which students develop both skill and confidence in making personal judgments and appreciating their consequences. At the primary hearing, the faculty member shall present evidence in support of the charge against the student. Three faculty members elected for three-year terms by the faculty of the college, except that in the case of the School of Continuing Education and Summer Sessions, the faculty members shall be appointed by the dean. DOCX Word message | Nursing homework help - SweetStudy Procedures 4. The record keeper shall disclose this record to Hearing Boards considering other charges against the same student, to deans or associate deans of colleges in furtherance of legitimate educational interests, to the Registrar for notation on the transcript when provided by the decision of the Hearing Board and the dean, but to no one else unless specifically directed by the student. first year student. LibGuides: APA Guidelines: Academic Integrity Like all other communities, the university can function properly only if its members adhere to clearly established goals and values. 1. ii. evidence indicating that the student has violated this Code. The student code of Academic Integrity is very important as you continue through college and I life. Respect for the procedures established to manage the use of the system. Integrity and ethical behavior are expected of every student in all academic work. Appeal of a finding of guilt. Recommend to the dean of the students college any other suitable action, including counseling, community service, or reprimand. that the conclusion of a violation is supported by the evidence and the sanction imposed is appropriate, then he/she shall uphold the faculty member's decision and sanction(s). Today, Arizona is home to 22 federally recognized tribes, with Tucson being home to the Oodham and the Yaqui. The student may appeal a decision of the Hearing Board. %%EOF b. Classroom misconduct is not a violation of academic integrity. Assisting or attempting to assist another to violate this Code. The Academic Integrity Code is to be upheld and enforced by all CCA students and faculty members. * Any college or school wishing to adopt a Board or procedures Academic integrity is expected not only in formal coursework situations, but in all University relationships and interactions connected to the educational process, including the use of University resources. The advisor may be dismissed from the hearing if University Hearing Board Chairperson finds that the advisor is disruptive. on Saturday of that week. Some of the examples of academic integrity violations are plagiarism, unauthorized assistance, and misrepresentation. A determination is arbitrary and capricious only if it is one no reasonable mind could reach.). The Code of Academic Integrity was established in the 1996-1997 academic year and was written and designed by students, faculty, librarians, and administrators. How do you put integrity into practice in both your academic and professional life? a. What are at least 2 examples of violations of the student code of academic integrity? A model Hearing Board consists of the following: a. Upon appeal, the Dean of the College shall review the faculty members decision, sanctions and supporting evidence, and any evidence provided by the student, and shall confer with the faculty member and the student. A student shall in no way misrepresent his or her work. However, students must submit their own individual work at all times unless instructed to participate in group work as part of a course requirement. The student shall be given the opportunity to respond and, if he or she wishes, to present evidence refuting the charge. The Board shall find the student guilty only if there is clear and convincing (see the definition at section II.B.4.c.) Violations of the Academic Honor Code in the Library Setting . Academic dishonesty threatens the, integrity of individual students as well as the Universitys academic community. 2023 The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of The University of Arizona. The Provost may designate a Vice Provost or other Vice President to act on his/her behalf. If such engagement takes place, it will be treated as part of the primary hearing. f. The individual seeking review shall notify the chairperson of the Hearing Board of the faculty members college within ten working days of In addition, the faculty member shall consider mitigating and aggravating factors in accordance with the provisions ofABOR Policy 5-308.H. hb```U Students encountering suspected cases of cheating should discreetly report the violator to their Course Instructor. Puget Sound's expectation is that students will inform themselves about the Student Integrity Code and make decisions that are in alignment with the code and their own personal values. If the student is represented by an attorney, the faculty member may also be represented by an attorney selected by the Universitys Office of the General Counsel. Although all members of the university community are expected to abide by the Integrity Principle and its attendant obligations, the standards provide an additional education resource. The advisor may confer with the student during any proceedings provided by this Code, but may only speak during a University Hearing Board. PDF University of Phoenix *Reflects change in nomenclature from Faculty Council of Representatives to Faculty Senate. Policy 1.2 applies to faculty, staff, and students. If the Boards decision involves students from more than one college, the deans involved shall consult with each other. The instructor retains responsibility for ruling on each case (see II.B.4(c) below) and therefore may wish to engage with a student from whose primary hearing the instructor was absent. If the faculty member assigns a notation on the transcript, suspension or expulsion from the University, or revocation of a degree as a sanction, the student is automatically granted an appeal to the Dean of the College. The faculty member must promptly notify the student of the reason for the imposition of a penalty for classroom misconduct and the degree to which his or her grade will be affected. Misrepresentation occurs when the student represents false situations to the faculty to justify their absence or to request for a make-up exam. Code of Academic Integrity | Student Conduct - George Washington University If possible, Faculty-Student Conferences and appeals may be heard during the summer or winter break. Students engaging in academic dishonesty diminish their education and bring discredit to the academic community and the campus. If the evidence supports a finding that the student has engaged in misconduct, the faculty member shall impose sanctions after considering the seriousness of the misconduct, the student's state of mind, and the harm done to the University and to other students. Students shall not violate the Code of Academic Integrity and shall avoid situations likely to compromise academic integrity. Suite 204 In the cases where the alleged violation is initiated by the Graduate College or the Honors College, the Deans of those Colleges will hear the appropriate appeal. I accept the responsibilities of my membership in this community and acknowledge that the purpose of this community demands that I conduct myself in accordance with Puget Sounds policies of Academic and Student Integrity. Code of Academic Integrity | Dean of Faculty - Cornell University Plagiarism - Intentional or unintentional representation of another's words or ideas as one's own in an academic exercise. These forms are available from theDean of Students Office website. b. that the conclusion of a violation is supported by the evidence, and the sanction(s) imposed are inadequate or excessive, then he/she shall modify the sanction(s) as appropriate. Students are responsible for understanding and following the University of Arizona Code of Academic Integrity. Once notified of the allegation of . At the primary hearing the following shall be present: the faculty member concerned, the student in question, and a third-party independent witness. Committed to diversity and inclusion, the University strives to build sustainable relationships with sovereign Native Nations and Indigenous communities through education offerings, partnerships, and community service. While the Hearing Board may recommend an increase in any penalty imposed at the primary hearing, it should consider raising the penalty, if it is the student seeking review, only in the exceptional case. The faculty member has the same right as students to challenge the participation of any Board member, as noted in the Student Disciplinary Procedures (. Students have the right to a fair consideration of the charges, to see the evidence, and to confidentiality, as allowed by law and fairness to other affected persons. In all but the most unusual circumstances, it is the expectation that the findings that the conclusion of a violation is not supported by the evidence, then he/she shall render a finding of no violation and that the sanction(s) imposed be overturned. Examples of plagiarism include but are not limited to: The exact copy of information from a source without proper citation and without use of quotation marks or block quotation formatting. University of the People fosters a spirit of honesty and integrity fundamental to a university community. a. Under this Code, the Dean of the College may designate another member of the college administration to act on his/her behalf. He or she believes the procedure was improper or unfair. Find the student innocent of the charge. Under no circumstances are students allowed to publicly share (for example on blogs, websites, social media, databases) their work completed at or for University of the People until two calendar years from the end of the students final term of study. jP7 Unauthorized assistance entails purchasing the assistance services such as having someone complete students exam or using sources that have not been authorized by the professor in the completion of particular academic work. The Dean of the College is the Dean of the faculty members academic college where the alleged violation occurred. The student may also appeal to a University Hearing Board if the Dean of the College failed to act on a request for an appeal of a faculty members decision within the 30 day period. student in the presentation and questioning. If a grade of "I" is assigned, the student shall have the opportunity to complete any remaining work without prejudice within the timeframe set forth in the students academic catalog. Academic Policies & Procedures - University of Phoenix Whenever notice is required in these procedures it shall be written notice delivered by hand or by other means that provides for verification of delivery including email delivery to a secure University email account. Student Code of Academic Integrity - Course Researchers parties may agree in writing to waive this quorum. A student shall not in any other manner violate the principle of. edS3mDL;!^R2}n9E/_EZd1e%FlV3Zt)'Os;4w8;'_#;30%}hx_.uNl2Y:gI_J%$oOT M/_i,GbD]PmRD5cRTy* PKy$;"g @GuvP^~uAAX*oq%f 9AhWrU?i%"+o?{YCb#pz85`z`1(hFW4Wmq~Y;DU9CC=FvUHU"o\tht~tl>_p*DCT.E5`U@\/5RT !d5iAm*UpSH]gQ5Al;$V9@Y;.'E"h, I am accustomed to having codes of conduct and codes of integrity. Tis record-keeper shall then be responsible for its communication to the record-keeper in the students college. 573 0 obj <> endobj If another penalty has been exacted (II.C.4.b.iv-viii), the dean may modify or decline to carry out the recommended penalty. Records academic institution or while enrolled in a Cornell-sponsored off-campus program may, if he or she feels the situation warrants, summon